Perspectives on Tom
Professional Affiliation
Author Archives: Tom Sanchez
North American Urban Planning Scholars Using Google Scholar Citation Profiles: An Update
The following is an updated list (by Hirsch Index) of urban planning faculty from schools in the U.S. and Canada. This is an update of my 2016 post “Ranking North American Urban Planning Scholars Using Google Scholar Citation Profiles.” There … Continue reading
Posted in bibliometrics, Citation analysis
Leave a comment
Comparing Urban Planning Program Citation Levels
Using citation totals or averages for groups of scholars, especially academic programs, tends to favor larger and/or older faculties. A simple way to normalize program totals is factoring the number of total years of faculty experience for each (estimated by … Continue reading
Posted in bibliometrics, Citation analysis, planning, publications
Leave a comment
The Most Frequently Cited Topics in Planning Scholarship
Methods The first step in this analysis was to collect publication records for urban planning academics. Current planning academics with Google Scholar Citation Profiles were used as the source of these data. The suitability of Google Scholar Citations (GS) data … Continue reading
Posted in Citation analysis, planning, publications
Leave a comment
Citations by Rank, Clearly a Difference
Using the most recent data for urban planning scholars (end of 2018), we see a distinct difference in citation totals between assistant, associate, and full professors. This comes as no surprise and I’ve previously reported on it but just wanted … Continue reading
Posted in Citation analysis, planning, publications
Leave a comment
2018 Urban Planning Citation Update
The most recent citation data for urban planning faculty are now available at: http://scholarmetrics.com/metrics This includes 1,111 U.S. and Canadian planning faculty, of which 626 have Google Scholar Citation Profiles. Data from profiles are used when available, otherwise counts for … Continue reading
Yes, h-index and total citations are highly correlated (in case you were wondering)
Data from over 1,100 urban planning academics in the U.S. and Canada show a strong correlation between the h-index and total (career) citations. These vary by rank as shown in my early post analyzing citation levels for all planning faculty … Continue reading
Posted in Citation analysis, planning, publications, research, Uncategorized
Leave a comment
By the Numbers: Urban Planning Faculty and Program Citations
For the past 7 years I have been tracking citations for urban planning faculty. I started with the U.S. and then added Canadian planning schools. Initially these were all done manually by searching Google Scholar with Publish or Perish and … Continue reading
Posted in Citation analysis, planning, publications, research
Tagged bibliometrics, citation analysis, planning research
2 Comments
Normalizing Citation Counts (Part 2)
I received several insightful comments about my previous post on normalizing citation counts. Several people also suggested that because I calculated these indices at the individual level, that it would be interesting to see the results at the program level. Below … Continue reading
Normalizing Citation Counts
Higher total citation counts are obviously biased toward more senior faculty who have had more time to publish and be cited. To account for this a variety of metrics have been developed to adjust for career length, output, and other … Continue reading
Citation Activity of Urban Planning Assistant Professors
Occasionally I am asked how the citation rankings for planning programs take into account the age and rank distribution of planning programs (see most recent analysis: http://tomwsanchez.com/2018-urban-planning-faculty-citation-analysis/). They do not. Younger faculties have fewer overall citations compared to older faculties. For … Continue reading